Resurfaced Clip Vindicates Melania, Debunks Hunter Biden’s Vulgar Claims

Just days after Melania Trump threatened Hunter Biden with a $1 billion defamation lawsuit, an old interview has resurfaced that appears to back her version of how she met Donald Trump. The former first lady is responding to Hunter Biden’s public claim that she was introduced to Donald Trump by Jeffrey Epstein—an allegation she and her legal team vehemently deny.

The interview in question features Melania and Donald Trump speaking with CNN’s Larry King shortly after their 2005 wedding. During the interview, Melania stated they met in September 1998 during New York Fashion Week. When asked if anyone introduced them, she clarified they met organically at a party, not through anyone else.

Donald Trump also shared details of their meeting, saying he was initially supposed to meet another woman at the party but was instantly drawn to Melania instead. The interview predates Epstein’s 2007 arrest, lending credibility to Melania’s timeline and casting doubt on Hunter Biden’s claim.

WATCH:.

Despite mounting evidence, Hunter Biden has stood by his statement. When asked by vlogger Andrew Callaghan if he would apologize to Melania, he bluntly replied, “F**k that. That’s not gonna happen,” dismissing the lawsuit as a joke.

Melania’s attorney, Alejandro Brito, has formally demanded that Hunter issue a public apology and retraction. In the letter, Brito stated that failing to comply would force Melania to pursue legal action to recover the reputational and financial damage she has suffered.

This is not the first time Melania has threatened legal action over similar claims. Earlier this month, the Daily Beast retracted an article linking her to Epstein after receiving a legal warning from her lawyer. As the controversy unfolds, Melania appears determined to defend her name and take legal steps if necessary.

Related Posts

A woman in a bikini appears nervous and unusually thin, prompting reflection on body image, health, and confidence. The moment highlights how outward appearances can mask personal struggles and the unseen pressures people carry behind public façades.

The image of a woman in a bikini, seemingly nervous and thin, exemplifies how a single moment can provoke countless interpretations. Without context, viewers instinctively assign meaning…

A GOP representative called for First Lady Jill Biden to face criminal charges alleging “elder abuse,” sparking debate. Legal experts question the claims’ validity, highlighting partisan tensions and the scrutiny public figures face over family-related accusations

The conclusion of the Biden presidency has prompted intense scrutiny of both the president’s cognitive health and the role of those closest to him, particularly First Lady…

Texas Attorney General filed a lawsuit to vacate 13 Democratic House seats after lawmakers staged a quorum-denying walkout, alleging rule violations and legislative disruption, while Democrats condemn it as an extreme effort to punish procedural protest

The political standoff in Texas over Democratic lawmakers fleeing the state to block Republican-led redistricting has escalated into a major legal confrontation. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton…

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer used a lengthy procedural maneuver to delay the vote on the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” aiming to negotiate support and address concerns, sparking debate over legislative strategy, transparency, and balancing procedure with policymaking.

Senate Democrats have deployed nearly every procedural tool at their disposal to slow President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda, culminating in an extraordinary all-night reading of his so-called…

A new government report shows June revenue exceeded expectations, largely driven by tariffs and import duties. While economists view the spike positively, concerns arise about sustainability and potential impacts on businesses and consumers amid reliance on trade-related fees

For decades, Americans have been told that tariffs inherently harm the domestic economy, increasing consumer prices, disrupting supply chains, and undermining fiscal stability. Conventional wisdom, supported by…

A Supreme Court review could force Democrats to lose dozens of congressional districts, reshaping electoral maps to favor Republicans. Analysts warn this redistricting may influence upcoming elections, representation, party balance, and legislative priorities, intensifying debates over gerrymandering.

The Democratic Party faces a potential electoral upheaval as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to rule on Louisiana v. Callais, a case with nationwide implications for congressional…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *