Gorsuch Warns Lower Courts After Repeatedly Ignoring Supreme Court Rulings

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by former President Donald Trump, expressed strong frustration with lower courts for defying Supreme Court rulings. His remarks came after the Court delivered a narrow 5-4 decision allowing the Trump administration to cut federal NIH research grants tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, gender identity studies, and COVID-19-related projects. The NIH will no longer issue grants based on DEI or race-based criteria.

Gorsuch, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, criticized what he called a troubling pattern of lower courts ignoring Supreme Court precedents. The immediate case involved a federal judge in Massachusetts who ordered NIH payments to continue, despite a prior Supreme Court ruling allowing similar cuts. Sixteen Democratic attorneys general and several health organizations had filed lawsuits, claiming the cuts were discriminatory.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett cast the deciding vote, aligning with the Court’s conservatives to halt the grants but also joining Chief Justice Roberts and the liberal justices to preserve a lower court ruling that struck down NIH policy guidance on DEI. Gorsuch warned that the Massachusetts ruling was part of a broader issue of judicial defiance, citing two other recent instances where lower courts had overstepped Supreme Court authority.

In one of those cases, even liberal Justice Elena Kagan joined the majority to block a district court’s resistance to Supreme Court orders. Another involved the Court upholding Trump’s power to fire members of administrative agencies, which a lower court had attempted to challenge.

Trump, since returning to office in 2025, has moved aggressively to dismantle Biden-era DEI initiatives, calling them discriminatory. The Supreme Court has supported several of his actions, including cutting DEI-linked teacher training grants.

Barrett added in a concurring opinion that the case should have been filed in a different court. The decision overturned a Reagan-appointed judge who had sharply condemned the cuts as discriminatory against LGBTQ communities.

Related Posts

GOP Set to Add Another Seat to House In State Redistricting Effort

A national redistricting fight is intensifying, with Republican-led legislatures across several states advancing new congressional maps aimed at expanding GOP representation. Encouraged by former President Donald Trump,…

Keeping Ashes at Home: What You Should Know Before Deciding

The loss of a loved one leaves an emotional space that words often can’t fill. For many, keeping a loved one’s ashes at home offers a way…

SHE BROKE THE INTERNET BY DOING WHAT “OLDER WOMEN” NEVER DO

They said she was “too old” to dress like that. So she did it anyway — and millions couldn’t look away. When her photo hit the feed,…

Jimmy Fallon reveals his family’s ”first baby” has passed away: ”Miss you so much”

Jimmy Fallon recently shared a deeply emotional tribute to his beloved golden retriever, Gary, who passed away after over 13 years with his family. Known for his…

Couple Secretly Marries, Fans React in Shock

Hollywood fans were recently surprised by news that one of the industry’s most private couples secretly wed in Tuscany. Far from the spotlight, the couple exchanged vows…

Pilot’s chilling final words before deadly plane crash comes to light

The Voepass disaster stands as a haunting reminder of how fragile the bond of trust is between humans and the technology they rely on. This tragedy goes…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *