Gorsuch Warns Lower Courts After Repeatedly Ignoring Supreme Court Rulings

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by former President Donald Trump, expressed strong frustration with lower courts for defying Supreme Court rulings. His remarks came after the Court delivered a narrow 5-4 decision allowing the Trump administration to cut federal NIH research grants tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, gender identity studies, and COVID-19-related projects. The NIH will no longer issue grants based on DEI or race-based criteria.

Gorsuch, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, criticized what he called a troubling pattern of lower courts ignoring Supreme Court precedents. The immediate case involved a federal judge in Massachusetts who ordered NIH payments to continue, despite a prior Supreme Court ruling allowing similar cuts. Sixteen Democratic attorneys general and several health organizations had filed lawsuits, claiming the cuts were discriminatory.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett cast the deciding vote, aligning with the Court’s conservatives to halt the grants but also joining Chief Justice Roberts and the liberal justices to preserve a lower court ruling that struck down NIH policy guidance on DEI. Gorsuch warned that the Massachusetts ruling was part of a broader issue of judicial defiance, citing two other recent instances where lower courts had overstepped Supreme Court authority.

In one of those cases, even liberal Justice Elena Kagan joined the majority to block a district court’s resistance to Supreme Court orders. Another involved the Court upholding Trump’s power to fire members of administrative agencies, which a lower court had attempted to challenge.

Trump, since returning to office in 2025, has moved aggressively to dismantle Biden-era DEI initiatives, calling them discriminatory. The Supreme Court has supported several of his actions, including cutting DEI-linked teacher training grants.

Barrett added in a concurring opinion that the case should have been filed in a different court. The decision overturned a Reagan-appointed judge who had sharply condemned the cuts as discriminatory against LGBTQ communities.

Related Posts

A woman in a bikini appears nervous and unusually thin, prompting reflection on body image, health, and confidence. The moment highlights how outward appearances can mask personal struggles and the unseen pressures people carry behind public façades.

The image of a woman in a bikini, seemingly nervous and thin, exemplifies how a single moment can provoke countless interpretations. Without context, viewers instinctively assign meaning…

A GOP representative called for First Lady Jill Biden to face criminal charges alleging “elder abuse,” sparking debate. Legal experts question the claims’ validity, highlighting partisan tensions and the scrutiny public figures face over family-related accusations

The conclusion of the Biden presidency has prompted intense scrutiny of both the president’s cognitive health and the role of those closest to him, particularly First Lady…

Texas Attorney General filed a lawsuit to vacate 13 Democratic House seats after lawmakers staged a quorum-denying walkout, alleging rule violations and legislative disruption, while Democrats condemn it as an extreme effort to punish procedural protest

The political standoff in Texas over Democratic lawmakers fleeing the state to block Republican-led redistricting has escalated into a major legal confrontation. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton…

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer used a lengthy procedural maneuver to delay the vote on the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” aiming to negotiate support and address concerns, sparking debate over legislative strategy, transparency, and balancing procedure with policymaking.

Senate Democrats have deployed nearly every procedural tool at their disposal to slow President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda, culminating in an extraordinary all-night reading of his so-called…

A new government report shows June revenue exceeded expectations, largely driven by tariffs and import duties. While economists view the spike positively, concerns arise about sustainability and potential impacts on businesses and consumers amid reliance on trade-related fees

For decades, Americans have been told that tariffs inherently harm the domestic economy, increasing consumer prices, disrupting supply chains, and undermining fiscal stability. Conventional wisdom, supported by…

A Supreme Court review could force Democrats to lose dozens of congressional districts, reshaping electoral maps to favor Republicans. Analysts warn this redistricting may influence upcoming elections, representation, party balance, and legislative priorities, intensifying debates over gerrymandering.

The Democratic Party faces a potential electoral upheaval as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to rule on Louisiana v. Callais, a case with nationwide implications for congressional…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *