The U.S. Department of Justice has launched an investigation into the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) over its racial equity hiring practices. In a letter to the agency, the DOJ suggested that CalEPA may be violating civil rights laws by engaging in discriminatory employment practices based on race, sex, color, or national origin. The focus is on CalEPA’s “Practices to Advance Racial Equity in Workforce Planning,” which emphasizes applying a “racial equity lens” in all phases of workforce development.
The DOJ’s letter highlights the agency’s efforts to ensure interview panels are diverse across racial, gender, and ethnic lines. While the DOJ probe does not imply guilt, it does suggest federal officials believe there is sufficient cause for a legal review. The inquiry is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to push back against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at various levels of government.
Political tensions between Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom have further fueled national attention. Newsom, a vocal critic of Trump and possible 2028 presidential contender, has often clashed with the former president on policies related to crime, homelessness, taxation, and environmental regulations. These long-standing political disputes underscore the federal-state friction over regulatory and social policies.
In a related legal development, a federal judge recently blocked two California laws aimed at regulating artificial intelligence in political campaigns. The laws sought to prevent the spread of deepfakes and AI-generated disinformation ahead of elections. However, Judge John Mendez ruled that the measures violated free speech rights and federal internet laws.
Mendez argued that while AI-driven disinformation is a concern, censorship is not the answer. His ruling emphasized the constitutional protection of political speech, even in the digital age. Tech platforms X and Rumble had challenged the laws based on Section 230 protections.
Newsom had signed the AI legislation in 2024, citing growing threats to democratic trust, but the court’s decision halts California’s push to lead in regulating political use of AI content ahead of the 2026 elections.
