A new California law banning law enforcement officers, including federal agents, from wearing masks during official duties has sparked a sharp backlash from federal authorities. Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, the measure is intended to promote transparency and accountability in policing, allowing the public to identify officers involved in misconduct.

The law permits face coverings only in specific scenarios such as riot control or public health emergencies. Supporters argue that visible identification of officers is critical to preventing abuse of power and enhancing public trust, especially in communities concerned about excessive force or civil rights violations.

However, federal officials say the law is unconstitutional when applied to federal agents. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, representing the Central District of California, issued a directive for federal agencies to disregard the law. He cited the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which gives federal law precedence over conflicting state regulations.

The Department of Homeland Security also expressed concern, particularly regarding ICE operations, where agents often wear masks to protect their identities due to security threats. Essayli warned that any state or individual attempt to interfere with federal enforcement related to this issue could lead to prosecution by his office.

This dispute marks another confrontation between California’s Democratic leadership and federal authorities, echoing past clashes over immigration policy during the Trump administration. Legal experts suggest this case may present a clearer constitutional issue than previous conflicts, as states generally cannot impose restrictions on federal officers executing federal duties.

Civil liberties groups backing the law argue that masked law enforcement contributes to public fear and undermines accountability. Meanwhile, federal agents emphasize personal safety, citing growing threats. With the law set to take effect in January, legal challenges or federal actions are expected before enforcement begins.