Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump From Deploying Natl. Guard to Portland

A federal judge in Oregon, Karin Immergut, has issued a temporary restraining order stopping the Trump administration from sending National Guard troops to Portland. This decision comes after President Trump announced plans to deploy troops to protect what he called a “war-ravaged” city. The judge, who was appointed by Trump, found that Oregon and Portland are likely to succeed in their argument that the president overstepped his constitutional authority, specifically violating the Tenth Amendment.

Critics of the ruling argue that the Constitution gives the president power as commander in chief, including over the state militias when called into service. However, Judge Immergut ruled that the recent protests cited by the administration do not rise to the level requiring military intervention and can be managed by regular law enforcement. She expressed concern that the administration’s arguments blurred the line between civil and military powers.

The Trump administration claimed that the National Guard would not serve in a law enforcement capacity, which would violate the Posse Comitatus Act, but would instead protect federal property from violent protests. Judge Immergut’s decision does not seem to consider Portland’s restrictions on local law enforcement cooperation with federal officers, nor the president’s constitutional role as military leader.

The restraining order will expire on October 18, though Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield plans to seek an extension. Meanwhile, the Trump administration intends to appeal the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Rayfield stated the order returns control of the National Guard to Oregon Governor Tina Kotek.

State and city leaders welcomed the ruling, asserting that Portland had not experienced a rebellion or breakdown of order that would justify federal troop deployment. They view the decision as a necessary check on presidential power based on evidence and law.

Governor Kotek called the ruling “a step in the right direction,” urging President Trump to respect the court and reconsider his plans.

Related Posts

GOP Set to Add Another Seat to House In State Redistricting Effort

A national redistricting fight is intensifying, with Republican-led legislatures across several states advancing new congressional maps aimed at expanding GOP representation. Encouraged by former President Donald Trump,…

Keeping Ashes at Home: What You Should Know Before Deciding

The loss of a loved one leaves an emotional space that words often can’t fill. For many, keeping a loved one’s ashes at home offers a way…

SHE BROKE THE INTERNET BY DOING WHAT “OLDER WOMEN” NEVER DO

They said she was “too old” to dress like that. So she did it anyway — and millions couldn’t look away. When her photo hit the feed,…

Jimmy Fallon reveals his family’s ”first baby” has passed away: ”Miss you so much”

Jimmy Fallon recently shared a deeply emotional tribute to his beloved golden retriever, Gary, who passed away after over 13 years with his family. Known for his…

Couple Secretly Marries, Fans React in Shock

Hollywood fans were recently surprised by news that one of the industry’s most private couples secretly wed in Tuscany. Far from the spotlight, the couple exchanged vows…

Pilot’s chilling final words before deadly plane crash comes to light

The Voepass disaster stands as a haunting reminder of how fragile the bond of trust is between humans and the technology they rely on. This tragedy goes…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *