Cassava remains one of the world’s most important food staples — especially across tropical and subtropical regions in sub‑Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America. According to recent reviews, cassava feeds over one billion people globally and provides essential calories in many countries where food security, climate variability, and poor soils limit alternative crops.
Its resilience is central to this role: cassava tolerates drought, thrives in marginal soils, and can be harvested year-round. These traits make it a key buffer crop in regions prone to climate stress or agricultural instability.
Because of this, cassava is often a reliable source of energy — its roots are processed into flour, starch, or eaten directly after cooking, forming a major portion of daily caloric intake for many households, especially among subsistence farmers and rural populations.
Thus, despite its drawbacks, cassava’s nutritional and agronomic advantages make it a cornerstone of food security for hundreds of millions — especially where other staples like rice or wheat are harder to produce.
The downside to cassava lies in its natural chemistry. The roots (and sometimes leaves) of cassava contain cyanogenic glucosides (principally linamarin and some lotaustralin), which — when cassava tissue is damaged (e.g., peeled, cut, grated) — may undergo enzymatic reactions (cyanogenesis) that release hydrogen cyanide (HCN), a potent toxin.
Because of this, improperly prepared cassava — especially “bitter” varieties that naturally contain high levels of cyanogens — can pose a serious poisoning risk. In these cultivars, cyanogen levels may be dangerously high, far above recommended safe limits.
Studies show that under certain conditions — e.g., environmental stress, nutrient‑poor soils — cassava plants may even produce more cyanogenic compounds than normal, exacerbating the risk. For example, a 2022 agronomic study from Tanzania noted that soil conditions (high pH or high iron) can increase cyanogenic glucoside production in cassava grown in “konzo‑affected” areas.
Thus, cassava’s threat is real, and context matters: the variety, growing conditions, and how the root is handled — all influence whether cassava becomes a safe staple or a toxic hazard.
When consumed without proper detoxification, cassava can cause serious health damage. Acute cyanide poisoning cases have been documented: ingestion of high‑cyanide cassava can lead to symptoms like dizziness, nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, headache — and in severe cases, death — because cyanide disrupts cellular respiration.
More alarmingly, chronic, long‑term consumption of inadequately processed cassava has been linked to persistent health issues. One of the most devastating is Konzo — a neurological disease characterized by sudden, irreversible paralysis of the legs (spastic paraparesis), primarily affecting children and young women in sub‑Saharan Africa where bitter cassava is a staple and protein intake is low.
Beyond paralysis, chronic exposure may contribute to other disorders: for example, in low‑iodine regions, the cyanide from cassava may interfere with thyroid function — exacerbating goitre and other thyroid disorders.
Even among individuals without overt paralysis, there is evidence for more subtle but serious effects: cognitive impairment and impaired motor function in children from areas with high cassava consumption and documented cyanide exposure. A 2014 study from the Democratic Republic of Congo found that cassava‑associated neurotoxicity can impair cognitive functions, even if konzo does not develop.
These health outcomes highlight that cassava toxicity is not just a theoretical concern — but a real, documented public‑health issue, especially where dietary monotony, poverty, and lack of protein worsen the risk.
The good news is that cassava can be safely consumed — as long as established detoxification methods are followed. Traditional and improved processing practices remove a large portion of cyanogenic compounds, making cassava root and flour safe for consumption.
Such methods typically include peeling (removing the skin, where much of the cyanogen concentrates), soaking or fermenting, grating or chipping, and thorough drying or fermentation before cooking or milling into flour.
One particularly effective technique is the so‑called “wetting method,” developed to reduce cyanide content of cassava flour: wet flour is spread thinly in the shade for several hours before use (e.g., for traditional porridge), which reduces cyanide 3‑ to 6‑fold.
When these practices are observed, cyanide levels in cassava (root or flour) can drop below safe thresholds — WHO/FAO guidelines generally set acceptable limits around 10 mg HCN equivalents per kg dry weight.
Thus, the problem is not cassava itself, but insufficient or hurried processing — often a consequence of poverty, food insecurity, or lack of resources/knowledge. In households or communities where people lack water, time, or awareness, cassava remains a dangerous staple; but where safe processing is practiced — it remains a vital, life‑sustaining food.