The latest escalation in the ongoing feud between the Trump camp and progressive Democrats, particularly Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), has ignited a firestorm of backlash after Crockett made pointed and personal remarks about former First Lady Melania Trump during a House Judiciary Committee hearing.
While the hearing was ostensibly focused on immigration and executive integrity, Crockett took a detour to question how Melania Trump qualified for the EB-1 visa—often referred to as the “Einstein visa,” intended for individuals with “extraordinary ability” in fields like science, arts, or athletics.
Mocking Melania’s modeling credentials, Crockett said, “When I say model, I’m not talking Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford, or Naomi Campbell-level.” She further questioned how Melania could have met the bar for such a selective visa, sarcastically listing Nobel Prizes, Pulitzers, and Olympic medals as examples of appropriate qualifications, then added, “It doesn’t take an Einstein to see that the math ain’t mathin’ here.”
Her remarks drew swift condemnation online. Critics accused Crockett of making a personal and “mean-spirited” attack that had little to do with policy and everything to do with optics. Some called her “jealous,” while others defended Melania’s accomplishments, including her ability to speak five languages and her successful modeling career before marrying Donald Trump.
The controversy comes amid renewed political tension, with Trump himself recently targeting Crockett and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), mocking them as part of the “low IQ” wing of the Democratic Party after the left-wing primary victory of Zohran Mamdani in New York.
For her part, Crockett appears to have used the moment to highlight perceived double standards in how immigration rules are applied to different people depending on their proximity to power. But for many observers, the personal nature of her comments has overshadowed that message.
The episode underscores how deeply personal U.S. politics has become, where attacks on policy often morph into attacks on individuals—especially those connected to high-profile figures. Whether this helps or hurts either side politically remains to be seen, but it clearly reflects the intensely polarized climate heading into the 2024 election season.
