FEC Chairwoman Rejects Trump’s Attempt To Remove Her

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub is refusing to step down after receiving a dismissal letter from President Donald Trump. She shared the letter on social media, calling the move legally invalid and saying that a proper process must be followed to replace an FEC commissioner.

The letter, dated January 31, stated that Weintraub was “removed… effective immediately.” Despite that, she announced her intention to remain in office. A longtime Democratic member of the FEC, Weintraub said she will continue to serve and called the letter an improper attempt to remove her from her role.

Currently, the FEC consists of three Democrats, two Republicans, and one vacant seat. Weintraub’s attempted removal follows a pattern seen earlier in the Trump administration, where more than a dozen inspectors general were dismissed. Those firings raised legal questions and led to bipartisan concern from lawmakers like Senators Dick Durbin and Chuck Grassley.

Representative Jamie Raskin criticized the move, calling it part of Trump’s ongoing “political purge.” He labeled the dismissal illegal and said it undermines the independence of agencies meant to provide oversight of federal elections and government operations.

The same day Weintraub’s firing became public, Democratic Representatives Judy Chu and Gwen Moore confronted House Speaker Mike Johnson over another controversial issue. They were concerned about Elon Musk’s team gaining access to a sensitive Treasury Department payment system that handles trillions of dollars in federal funds.

According to Chu, Moore entered the Speaker’s office first, and she followed. They intended to question Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” and its growing role in federal decision-making. However, Bessent was not present during their visit.

A witness described the lawmakers’ actions as aggressive, but Chu’s office pushed back. Her spokesperson said she was invited into the meeting and described the interaction as brief and respectful.

Both the Weintraub incident and the confrontation with Speaker Johnson reflect deepening tensions in Washington. As private figures like Musk gain influence in federal operations, critics warn of blurred lines between government authority and corporate interests—and the erosion of key democratic safeguards.

Related Posts

After saving my husband’s life, he tried to take everything, sparking a legal battle. During the case, my daughter revealed a secret, exposing hidden truths that dramatically shifted the outcome.

Two days after donating one of her kidneys to her husband, the narrator experienced a shocking betrayal that would upend her life. She had undertaken the transplant…

“Can you really spot the hidden number?” is a visual puzzle that hides numbers within patterns, colors, or shapes. Solving it sharpens observation, attention to detail, and visual perception skills through focused scanning and perspective shifts.

A colorful spiral with wavy purple, yellow, and blue lines recently captivated the internet, concealing the number 9867523 within its curves. Its viral appeal comes from the…

When asked to train my higher-paid replacement, I stayed professional but highlighted my own skills and value. By demonstrating expertise and dedication, I subtly reminded my boss of the loyalty and contributions of existing employees.

You sensed something was off when asked to train your replacement, and HR confirmed your fears: she would earn $85,000 for the same role you held at…

A law professor’s analysis of a recent Supreme Court tariff ruling has sparked debate, especially among Democrats critical of its implications. The expert contends the decision strengthens executive authority over trade, potentially curbing congressional oversight. Supporters view it as constitutionally sound, while critics fear shifts in economic and political power.

The Supreme Court of the United States delivered a significant constitutional rebuke to Donald Trump on Friday, ruling that he cannot rely on the International Emergency Economic…

The Supreme Court of the United States appears inclined to narrow key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, based on recent arguments. Some justices signaled openness to limiting protections on voting access and discrimination claims, prompting civil rights advocates to warn of reduced federal oversight nationwide.

The Supreme Court of the United States appears poised to significantly reshape enforcement of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, one of the last…

Donald Trump is reportedly seeking millions in damages from Fani Willis, with his legal team alleging a botched prosecution caused reputational and financial harm. Critics dispute those claims, adding another high-profile twist to ongoing Georgia legal proceedings involving the former president.

Donald Trump is seeking nearly $6.3 million from Fulton County following the collapse of the criminal case brought against him by District Attorney Fani Willis. The dispute…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *