Trump’s DOJ Makes Huge Announcement About Biden’s Pardons

A top official from former President Donald Trump’s Justice Department, Ed Martin, has launched an investigation into clemency decisions made by President Joe Biden during his final days in office. Martin, who serves as the Justice Department’s pardon attorney, disclosed in an internal email that the probe will examine the use of the autopen and whether Biden was competent at the time.

The autopen, a device that replicates signatures, is central to the inquiry. Trump supporters have made repeated, though unsubstantiated, claims that Biden’s use of the autopen casts doubt on the legitimacy of his presidential decisions. It remains unclear whether the device was used to sign the pardons in question.

The investigation centers around preemptive pardons issued to several members of Biden’s family and the commutation of 37 death sentences to life imprisonment. Biden’s stated reason for pardoning five of his relatives—including his son Hunter and siblings James, Frank, and Valerie Biden—was to protect them from potential politically motivated investigations.

While Martin’s email didn’t clarify who ordered the probe, he confirmed that the investigation into Biden’s use of the autopen and the decision-making process behind the pardons has been underway for some time. He also revealed that a whistleblower, described as a senior Democrat with ties to the 2020 Biden campaign, has come forward with serious allegations.

According to Martin, the whistleblower accused key Biden aides of controlling access to the president and profiting from the clemency process. The individuals named include Ron Klain, Anita Dunn, Robert Bauer, Steve Ricchetti, and First Lady Jill Biden. Martin added that the whistleblower ruled out involvement from Susan Rice.

In an interview, Martin stressed the need to investigate thoroughly, citing the need to “protect the process” and maintain trust in presidential authority.

In a related development, the nonprofit Power the Future raised questions about eight major energy-related executive orders signed by Biden. The group found no public record of Biden discussing these orders, suggesting that the autopen may have been used without Biden’s direct awareness.

These developments have fueled ongoing speculation about Biden’s autonomy and competence during his final months in office.

Related Posts

After saving my husband’s life, he tried to take everything, sparking a legal battle. During the case, my daughter revealed a secret, exposing hidden truths that dramatically shifted the outcome.

Two days after donating one of her kidneys to her husband, the narrator experienced a shocking betrayal that would upend her life. She had undertaken the transplant…

“Can you really spot the hidden number?” is a visual puzzle that hides numbers within patterns, colors, or shapes. Solving it sharpens observation, attention to detail, and visual perception skills through focused scanning and perspective shifts.

A colorful spiral with wavy purple, yellow, and blue lines recently captivated the internet, concealing the number 9867523 within its curves. Its viral appeal comes from the…

When asked to train my higher-paid replacement, I stayed professional but highlighted my own skills and value. By demonstrating expertise and dedication, I subtly reminded my boss of the loyalty and contributions of existing employees.

You sensed something was off when asked to train your replacement, and HR confirmed your fears: she would earn $85,000 for the same role you held at…

A law professor’s analysis of a recent Supreme Court tariff ruling has sparked debate, especially among Democrats critical of its implications. The expert contends the decision strengthens executive authority over trade, potentially curbing congressional oversight. Supporters view it as constitutionally sound, while critics fear shifts in economic and political power.

The Supreme Court of the United States delivered a significant constitutional rebuke to Donald Trump on Friday, ruling that he cannot rely on the International Emergency Economic…

The Supreme Court of the United States appears inclined to narrow key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, based on recent arguments. Some justices signaled openness to limiting protections on voting access and discrimination claims, prompting civil rights advocates to warn of reduced federal oversight nationwide.

The Supreme Court of the United States appears poised to significantly reshape enforcement of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, one of the last…

Donald Trump is reportedly seeking millions in damages from Fani Willis, with his legal team alleging a botched prosecution caused reputational and financial harm. Critics dispute those claims, adding another high-profile twist to ongoing Georgia legal proceedings involving the former president.

Donald Trump is seeking nearly $6.3 million from Fulton County following the collapse of the criminal case brought against him by District Attorney Fani Willis. The dispute…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *