As former President Donald Trump pushes forward with his aggressive immigration and deportation policies, attention has turned to First Lady Melania Trump’s own immigration history, raising allegations of hypocrisy. Trump’s recent threats to deport figures like a New York mayoral candidate from Uganda and Elon Musk have intensified the spotlight on immigration.

Trump’s plan includes a controversial new migrant detention facility in Florida—nicknamed “Alligator Alcatraz”—and a renewed push to end birthright citizenship, bolstered by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling limiting lower courts from blocking the policy nationally. These measures are part of a broader Republican strategy to expel undocumented immigrants and restrict immigration benefits.

This week, Melania Trump visited a detention center in Tucson, Arizona, where she praised ICE officials for their work. Her appearance sparked backlash, leading critics to reexamine how she came to the U.S. and became a citizen.

According to an investigation, Melania arrived in 1996 on a B‑1/B‑2 tourist visa, which prohibited paid work. However, she reportedly earned over $20,000 from modeling jobs during the two months before she obtained a legal H‑1B work visa. This employment, while on a tourist visa, constitutes a violation of immigration law.

Although Melania eventually gained a green card and became a U.S. citizen in 2006, critics say the seven-week period of unauthorized work undercuts the Trump administration’s hardline stance on immigration. Social media users highlighted the contrast, with many questioning why Melania is not held to the same standard as others being deported for similar violations.

Some commenters suggested Melania benefitted from leniency and connections unavailable to average immigrants. Others went further, calling for her deportation or legal review of her naturalization process.

The controversy underscores ongoing tension in Trump-era immigration discourse. While millions face detention or deportation for relatively minor infractions, critics argue that powerful individuals like Melania Trump are shielded from consequences.

As debates over fairness and accountability in immigration policy intensify, Melania’s story has become a focal point in discussions about double standards and political exploitation of immigration law.