The directive, issued in recent weeks, signals a renewed focus on internal security and leak prevention across the intelligence community. It follows a series of high-profile breaches and growing concerns about classified information being shared with the media.

Several federal agencies have already introduced similar measures, using polygraph tests as a tool to deter unauthorized disclosures and reinforce accountability within their ranks. Gabbard’s move extends that effort to the broader intelligence workforce.

Officials say the review will determine not only whether random polygraphs are practical but also how they might be implemented fairly and effectively without undermining morale or privacy protections.

The timing of the directive coincides with heightened scrutiny of internal leaks, particularly after the recent indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. Comey was charged by a federal grand jury last month with making false statements to Congress after denying that he leaked information to reporters.

While Gabbard’s directive does not cite Comey’s case directly, intelligence insiders view it as part of a larger effort to restore trust, discipline, and integrity within federal agencies.

Critics, however, warn that random polygraph testing could create a climate of fear, arguing that such exams are often unreliable and intrusive. Supporters counter that the measure is necessary to safeguard national security and deter misconduct.

As agencies begin their evaluations, officials stress that no final decision has been made. The findings of the review are expected to guide whether the intelligence community formally adopts random polygraph testing in the months ahead.