Several Democrats spoke out on Sunday following President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities—not with praise, but with claims that the president violated the Constitution. Among them was Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, who argued that Trump’s military action lacked congressional approval, calling it a “clear violation of the Constitution.” This criticism came despite longstanding executive authority under the War Powers Resolution, which allows presidents to respond to imminent threats without prior congressional consent. Himes also expressed skepticism about the mission’s success, stating, “It is impossible to know at this stage whether this operation accomplished its objectives.” Himes’ concerns echoed a broader unease among Democrats about escalating U.S. involvement in the Middle East, even when aimed at curbing future threats. He warned the strike could provoke further regional escalation and attacks on American forces.

Similarly, Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) condemned the action as “illegal and terrifying,” arguing it risked drawing the U.S. closer to war and endangering millions of lives. She urged Congress to immediately pass the War Powers Resolution to limit presidential authority. Legally, under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, presidents may authorize limited military action without Congress for up to 60 days to address imminent threats or protect U.S. personnel. Despite this, many Democrats remain uneasy, especially given Iran’s ongoing nuclear program, enrichment activities, and support for proxy militias. The recent U.S. strike targeted key nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and missile-linked facilities near Esfahan. President Trump called the operation a “very successful attack” and urged that “now is the time for peace.”