In July 2024, former President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. A 20-year-old man named Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire with an AR-15-style rifle from a rooftop, firing eight rounds. Trump, then 79, sustained a minor injury when one bullet grazed his right ear. The attack also resulted in the death of a rally attendee and left two others critically wounded.
Trump was quickly escorted offstage as blood ran down his face. He later described the incident on social media, saying he heard a “whizzing sound” and felt the bullet rip through his ear. His team released a note from a former White House doctor confirming the bullet narrowly missed entering his skull and that Trump was recovering well.
Despite official statements, skepticism emerged. Critics reviewed photos of Trump’s ear before and after the attack and claimed no visible injury or difference could be detected. This fueled conspiracy theories suggesting the shooting was staged to gain sympathy and political support. Some argued ear cartilage does not regrow, and therefore the identical appearance proved the wound was fabricated.
FBI Director Christopher Wray addressed the incident in testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. He admitted uncertainty about whether Trump was hit by a bullet or shrapnel, explaining the bullet might have ended up elsewhere. He confirmed all cartridge casings had been recovered but could not definitively state that Trump was struck by a bullet.
The FBI emphasized their commitment to investigating the shooting thoroughly. They continue examining evidence, including bullet fragments, to understand the attack’s details and the shooter’s motives. A spokesperson stressed the attack was a serious assassination attempt with multiple victims.
Online discussions remain divided. Some argue the lack of visible injury undermines Trump’s account, while others call for more evidence and transparency. The debate highlights ongoing public mistrust and conspiracy theories surrounding high-profile political events.
The FBI maintains the investigation is active and stresses the gravity of the attack. Yet, as the anniversary approaches, questions and theories persist in the public sphere, keeping the incident in the spotlight.
